Re: [Xen-devel] Error restoring DomU when using GPLPV

[ANNIE LI <annie.li@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

> > Yes, that's weird. Do you know what condition causes guest memory allocation
> > failure on xc_domain_restore? Is it due to hitting the guest maxmem limit in
> > Xen? If so, is maxmem the same value across multiple iterations of
> > save/restore or migration?
> >   
> Sorry, i have no idea about it. Maybe I need to print more log in 
> for(;;) in xc_domain_restore to see what is the difference between 
> without and with balooning down pages.
I did some migration test on linux/windows PVHVM on Xen3.4.

*  I printed the value of  "pfn      = region_pfn_type[i] & 
~XEN_DOMCTL_PFINFO_LTAB_MASK;"  in xc_domain_restore.c. When restoring 
fails with error "Failed allocation for dom 2: 33 extents of order 0", 
the value of pfn is less than that of restoring successfully. So i think 
it should not due to hitting the guest maxmem limit in Xen. Is it correct?
* After comparing difference between with and without ballooning down 
(gnttab+shinfo) pages, i find that:
If the windows pv driver balloon down those pages, there will be more 
pages with XEN_DOMCTL_PFINFO_XTAB type in saving process. Furthermore, 
more bogus/unmapped page are skipped in restoring process.
If the winpv driver do not balloon down those pages,  there are only a 
little such pages with XEN_DOMCTL_PFINFO_XTAB type to be processed 
during save/restore process.
* Another result about winpv driver with ballooning down those pages
When doing save/restore for the second time, i find p2msize in 
restoring process become 0xfefff which is less than the normal size 
0x100000.
Any suggestion about those test result? Or any idea to resolve this 
problem in winpv or xen?
Thanks
Annie.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel