[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] Vt-d not working with 3.4.1
Yes, we usually observed that the iommu fault on bdf 00:02.0 is harmless. What problem of VT-d did you find? Dom0 hang? Cannot passthrough device? Regards, Weidong Ross Philipson wrote: > The message will remain regardless of whether you set > iommu_inclusive_mapping or not. The parameter is there to work around > the underlying issue but the issue is not actually corrected. So the > code that generates the message (which is detecting discrepancies > between the e820 map and the DMAR RMRR values) will continue to > report this even though you used the parameter. The real question is > whether you are experiencing some other problems beyond the warning > message - like a boot hang? > > Thanks > Ross > > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Bonenkamp, Ralf > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 10:46 AM > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Vt-d not working with 3.4.1 > > Hi Pasi, > > Sorry - I forgot to mention that I've tried setting the > iommu_inclusive_mapping=1 parameter too, but unfortunate I posted the > output from a previous attempt without this parameter. > > The xm dmesg output and the DMAR parsing error remains the same. This > was the reason posting, because I ran out of ideas... > > Best regards > Ralf Bonenkamp > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pasi Kärkkäinen [mailto:pasik@xxxxxx] > Sent: Montag, 17. August 2009 16:32 > To: Bonenkamp, Ralf > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Vt-d not working with 3.4.1 > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 11:53:23PM +0200, Bonenkamp, Ralf wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> currently I try to setup a new xen host v3.4.1 on top of a Asus >> P5E-VM DO (latest BIOS, Vt-d capable and enabled in BIOS) to migrate >> my extisting HVMs (Win2k3 server) running on Xen v3.3.0 to a new >> home. I want to switch over to 3.4.1 to (hopefully!) passthrough my >> ISDN board to a HVM domU. Unfortunate there seem some issue with the >> VT-d DMAR tables which is beyond my knowledge and probably someone >> has some hint how to proceed? :-) >> > > Well did you try iommu_inclusive_mapping=1, like it suggests ? > >> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:401: RMRR address range not in reserved memory >> base = 7d600000 end = 7dffffff; iommu_inclusive_mapping=1 parameter >> may be needed. (XEN) Intel VT-d DMAR tables have been parsed. > > -- Pasi > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |