[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fixed legacy issues when extends number of vcpus > 32

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Let me think about these. For patch 1 I think we can perhaps do more work in
the loop which matches vlapic identifiers, and thus avoid needing a
"temporary cpumask" to remember matches. For patch 2 I've been intending to
throw away the VMX VPID logic and share the SVM logic, as it flushes TLBs no
more than the VMX logic and doesn't suffer the same problems with VPID/ASID
exhaustion.

 Thanks,
 Keir

On 16/08/2009 03:17, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi, Keir
>   Attached two patches fixed the legacy issues after extending number of vcpus
> to more for HVM domain.  The first one fixed vcpu bitmask issue for interrupt
> delivery, and the second one fixed vpid shortage issue after extending number
> of vcpus.  
> Xiantao



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel