[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC] transcendent memory for Linux
OK, OK, I give up. I will ensure all code for shared pools is removed from the next version of the patch. Though for future reference, I am interested in what problems it has other than "just" security (offlist if you want). > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@xxxxxx] > > > > Yeah, a shared namespace of accessible objects is an entirely > > > new thing > > > in the Xen universe. I would also drop Xen support until > > > there's a good > > > security story about how they can be used. > > > > While I agree that the security is not bulletproof, I wonder > > if this position might be a bit extreme. Certainly, the NSA > > should not turn on tmem in a cluster, but that doesn't mean that > > nobody should be allowed to. I really suspect that there are > > This has more problems than "just" security, and yes, security should > be really solved at design time... > > Pavel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |