[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] OpenSolaris 2009.06 in stub (hvm) domain at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 with 2.6.30 vs 2.6.29.4 xenified kernel
- To: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:11:20 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=H49UnE5kkhbyfqNKn9hKgkEEEch79NazISUL5MDO43gPQrGGX5bVgnRU/NshZLEDBQR2ybMVx71Tin8tesWt9zxeCAo166ZJosF6eteyV3AJxBS0shIerB2BjtTOdVLeeM90nbuC+NWBsSuDUQX8yIfoCQjBEiULbreSMyaVRvI=;
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Typo, sorry.
Finally,
Loading OSOL 2009.06 with PV drivers in HVM DomU
2.6.30-rc6-tip (pvops) - yes
2.6.29.4 (xenified) - yes
2.6.30 (xenified) - no
Loading OSOL 2009.06 with PV drivers in stub domain:-
2.6.30-rc6-tip (pvops) - not supported
2.6.29.4 (xenified) - yes
2.6.30 (xenified) - no
Boris
--- On Sat, 7/4/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] OpenSolaris 2009.06 in stub (hvm) domain at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 with 2.6.30 vs 2.6.29.4 xenified kernel
To: "Andrew Lyon" <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 3:58 PM
Finally,
Loading OSOL 2009.06 with PV
drivers in HVM DomU
2.6.30-rc6-tip (pvops) - yes
2.6.29.4 (xenified) - no
2.6.30 (xenified) - no
Loading OSOL 2009.06 with PV drivers in stub domain:-
2.6.30-rc6-tip (pvops) - not supported
2.6.29.4 (xenified) - yes
2.6.30 (xenified) - no
Boris
--- On Sat, 7/4/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] OpenSolaris 2009.06 in stub (hvm) domain at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 with 2.6.30 vs 2.6.29.4 xenified kernel
To: "Andrew Lyon" <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 1:01 PM
I don't know how about Windows HVM , for OSOL
performance impact is significant.
Boris.
--- On Sat, 7/4/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] OpenSolaris 2009.06 in stub (hvm) domain at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 with 2.6.30 vs 2.6.29.4 xenified kernel
To: "Andrew Lyon" <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, July 4, 2009, 12:07 PM
Andy,
OSOL 2009.06 been installed in stub domain (hvm domain) at
mentioned Dom0 with 2.6.30 xenified kernel via xen-patches-2.6.30-2.tar.bz2 refuse to activate PV drivers. When same Dom0 starts with 2.6.29.4 xenified kernel (xen-patches-2.6.29-6.tar.bz2) kernel OSOL 2009.06 in stub (hvm) domain does activate PV drivers for xdf, xnf .
Boris
|
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
