[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH] ioemu: ignore the arg of tapdisk
Yeah, that does seem to be the conclusion, but it's very wrong.Let me try again to clear this up. The args in tapdisk problem has NOTHING to do with blktap2. It was a change made for ioemu in 19346. Since the first prefix "tap" means tapdisk, the second prefix is an oddly structured hack to use some of the tapdisk infrastructure towards a new end. Is anyone actually using this? If not, maybe we should cut it to avoid the confusion-inducing clutter. --Dutch On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Ian Jackson wrote: Zhang, Yang writes ("RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH] ioemu: ignore the arg of tapdisk"):hi Ian, If the patch is fine to you, can you help me to check in it. Or else when use "tap:tapdisk:qcow2" which introduced by blktap2 at config file will raise error in qemu.I thought the conclusion of the discussion was that the requirement to specify `tap:tapdisk' was a bug in the blktap2 configuration arrangements ? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |