[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] adjust the way cpumasks get passed around (v2)

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:43:59 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 May 2009 06:44:27 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: AcndPLxgY03UGZSQSNu4qZMqW5ajCQAAh6xY
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] adjust the way cpumasks get passed around (v2)

On 25/05/2009 14:27, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On x86 this changes send_IPI_mask() to always only send IPIs to remote
> CPUs (meaning any caller needing to handle the current CPU as well has
> to do so on its own).

Why?

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] adjust the way cpumasks get passed around (v2)
  - From: Keir Fraser

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] adjust the way cpumasks get passed around (v2)
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] remove unused parameter of on_selected_cpus() & Co
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [HVM] cross-vendor migration: Allow 32bit-apps run in 64bit guests (resend)
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] adjust the way cpumasks get passed around (v2)
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] adjust the way cpumasks get passed around (v2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.