[Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?

[Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 17:54 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> @@ -819,8 +796,8 @@ swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(struct device *hwdev, struct 
> scatterlist *sgl, int nelems,
>                 phys_addr_t paddr = sg_phys(sg);
>                 dma_addr_t dev_addr = swiotlb_phys_to_bus(hwdev, paddr);
>  
> -               if (range_needs_mapping(paddr, sg->length) ||
> -                   address_needs_mapping(hwdev, dev_addr, sg->length)) {
> +               if (!is_buffer_dma_capable(hwdev, dma_get_mask(hwdev), paddr, 
> sg->length) ||
> +                   swiotlb_force) {
>                         void *map = map_single(hwdev, sg_phys(sg),
>                                                sg->length, dir);
>                         if (!map) {

BTW I think there was a typo here, dev_addr becomes paddr. I fixed that
in my updated version.

Ian.
-- 
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Isis - In Fiction

Poorochrondria:
        Hypochrondria derived from not having medical insurance.
                -- Douglas Coupland, "Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated
                   Culture"


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel