[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] First release candidate for Xen 3.4.0
- To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc:
- Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:20:59 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ncYa8rfR0G0WA+b6LFnhuv3d9l+9eeQ64u/uiyNZSDYxSKbgOtUgNBtJhG70QT2YF3r11vtXuD96hMeMNb5zNuaVqFhm0VweHS6EycUoddo0Q+ilir/Tfm1EusvtoTy9rtFySkAkUC6isR3PhRHg3JMer/cZIAVCR17oCYdl+sQ=;
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Do you expect stubdom in the most recent Xen Unstable ( changeset 19534)
to work with xen-ified kernel different from 2.6.18-xen ?
I've got same negative results for Suse's 2.6.27.5 kernel as a month before.
Boris
--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] First release candidate for Xen 3.4.0
To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 2:25 AM
Folks,
The first release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 is available at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg, tagged as '3.4.0-rc1'.
Please test!
--
Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
