[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: spinlock requests (was RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch] don't spin with irq disabled)
On 31/03/2009 14:40, "Juergen Gross" <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dan Magenheimer wrote: >> Thanks Juergen. Do you know of any GPLv2 code that implements >> this improved rwlock solution? (I don't think Linux does, >> does it?) > > Good question. > I just looked into the Linux code and decided not to analyse it. :-) > I have implemented a solution for our BS2000 system on Xen. It is just > a rather simple state machine using the cmpxchg instruction for the > update of the (structured) lock word. > If there is common interest for this solution I could prepare a patch. If we care that much about fairness we should use ticket- or queue-based locks. I don't believe any of our locks are contended enough to be a concern. If they were, that would be a concern in itself. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |