[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access

To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:05:43 -0700
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>, "linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:06:12 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Tian, Kevin wrote:

OK, then it's safe to avoid that change. I had thought that dom0's 0-1M
is identity-mapped to machine 0-1M... :-)


No, only the ISA 640k-1M region.

   J


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access
  - From: Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access
  - From: Tian, Kevin

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] ioemu: Fix MSI/MSI-X capability structure virtualization code
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH 12/13] Kemari: use signal to save qemu state for Kemari
Previous by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.