[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] why io resource base set to c000?

To: Alexia Benington <alexbenington@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:29:40 +0000
Cc:
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:30:16 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: AcmmrsG5ms/BMMhZTamMTI3Ol+W2eQAI2A/r
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] why io resource base set to c000?

On 17/03/2009 03:16, "Alexia Benington" <alexbenington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Could someone explain to me why, at line 304 of hvmloader.c, the io
> resource base address was set to be 0xc000? Thanks! :)

c000-ffff is a handy range of otherwise unused io ports. That's all.

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] why io resource base set to c000?
  - From: Alexia Benington

Prev by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] re-work MCA telemetry internals; use common code for Intel/AMD MCA
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/27] xen: make sure swiotlb allocationisphysically contigious
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] why io resource base set to c000?
Next by thread: [Xen-users] VM's are not booting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.