Re: [Xen-devel] memory_reservation bug?

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/03/2009 17:32, "Mick Jordan" <Mick.Jordan@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've looked at the code in memory.c and page_alloc.c and Xen certainly
> thinks tot_pages > max_pages for the domain when it reports the error.
> 
> The extent_order on the reservations is 0.
> 
> Any ideas?

Just because you called decrease_reservation() doesn't mean the pages
necessarily really got freed. If you still have mappings to them squirrelled
away then the free can be deferred.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel