Re: [Xen-devel] Could not run HVM domain on the latest xen-unstable.hgand Barcelona.

[Kouya Shimura <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Tamura-san,

Thank you for testing. That is very helpful.
PMM works well as I expected. gPXE looks the culprit.

May I ask you one more favor?
Could you take an output of the following command for about 30sec.
N.B. replace "<domid>" as the domain id.
=================================================================
$ while true; do /usr/lib64/xen/bin/xenctx <domid>; sleep 1; done
=================================================================

Thanks,
Kouya

Yoshiaki Tamura writes:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for handling this issue.
> I tried your patch and got the following messages.
> 
> > If the guest dies with the following serial console message, 32bit
> > gateway code is correct. otherwise, the guest hanging up means PMM is
> > innocent.
> > ==========================================================================
> > (XEN) io.c:199:d1 MMIO emulation failed @ 0008:deadbeaf: db e6 1c 80 8c 82
> > (XEN) hvm.c:810:d1 Triple fault on VCPU0 - invoking HVM system reset.
> > ==========================================================================
> 
> (XEN) HVM1: ata1 master: QEMU DVD-ROM ATAPI-4 CD-Rom/DVD-Rom
> (XEN) HVM1: IDE time out
> (XEN) HVM1:
> (XEN) io.c:199:d1 MMIO emulation failed @ 0008:deadbeaf: 00 00 00 00 84 be
> (XEN) hvm.c:810:d1 Triple fault on VCPU0 - invoking HVM system reset.
> 
> > If you get the above message, please revert only 32bitgateway.c and
> > try again. You can get debug messages of PMM.
> 
> I reverted 32bitgateway.c part, and got the following message on the console.
> 
> (XEN) HVM1: PMM Alloc length=20000 handle=ffffffff flags=6 ret=200000
> 
> Let me know if I was doing wrong.
> Hope this help.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yoshi
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Kouya
> > 
> > Huang2, Wei writes:
> >> We saw this problem recently. I traced it down to PMM patch submitted by
> >> Kouya and Akio (changeset 19077). 
> >>
> >> To fix this problem temporarily, add mode=e1000 to your vif option. 
> >> vif = [ 'type=ioemu, bridge=xenbr0, model=e1000'] 
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> -Wei
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yoshisato
> >> YANAGISAWA
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 3:17 AM
> >> To: xen-devel
> >> Subject: [Xen-devel] Could not run HVM domain on the latest
> >> xen-unstable.hgand Barcelona.
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Does anybody have tested the latest xen-unstable.hg with an HVM domain
> >> on AMD Barcelona Opteron?
> >> I cloned xen-unstable.hg today (2009-03-10 JST), made config file for
> >> booting an OS image from CD-ROM, and tried to run an HVM domain.
> >> However, it stops running while booting.
> >>
> >> According to the vnc, the virtual machine displayed following message:
> >> (snip)
> >> | Bochs BIOS - build: 06/23/99
> >> | $Revision: 1.221 $ $Date: 2008/12/07 17:32:29 $
> >> | Options: apmbios pcibios eltorito PMM
> >> |
> >> | ata1 master: QEMU DVD-ROM ATAPI-4 CD-Rom/DVD-Rom
> >> |
> >> | gPXE (http://etherboot.org) - 00:04.0 C900 PCI2.10 INT19 PMM0020_
> >>
> >> According to the serial console, I also saw following message:
> >> (XEN) HVM1: HVM Loader
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Detected Xen v3.4-unstable
> >> (XEN) HVM1: CPU speed is 2300 MHz
> >> (XEN) irq.c:235: Dom1 PCI link 0 changed 0 -> 5
> >> (XEN) HVM1: PCI-ISA link 0 routed to IRQ5
> >> (XEN) irq.c:235: Dom1 PCI link 1 changed 0 -> 10
> >> (XEN) HVM1: PCI-ISA link 1 routed to IRQ10
> >> (XEN) irq.c:235: Dom1 PCI link 2 changed 0 -> 11
> >> (XEN) HVM1: PCI-ISA link 2 routed to IRQ11
> >> (XEN) irq.c:235: Dom1 PCI link 3 changed 0 -> 5
> >> (XEN) HVM1: PCI-ISA link 3 routed to IRQ5
> >> (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 01:3 INTA->IRQ10
> >> (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 03:0 INTA->IRQ5
> >> (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 04:0 INTA->IRQ5
> >> (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 02:0 bar 10 size 02000000: f0000008
> >> (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 03:0 bar 14 size 01000000: f2000008
> >> (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 02:0 bar 14 size 00001000: f3000000
> >> (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 03:0 bar 10 size 00000100: 0000c001
> >> (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 04:0 bar 10 size 00000100: 0000c101
> >> (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 04:0 bar 14 size 00000100: f3001000
> >> (XEN) HVM1: pci dev 01:1 bar 20 size 00000010: 0000c201
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Multiprocessor initialisation:
> >> (XEN) HVM1:  - CPU0 ... 48-bit phys ... fixed MTRRs ... var MTRRs [2/8]
> >> ... don.
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Testing HVM environment:
> >> (XEN) HVM1:  - REP INSB across page boundaries ... passed
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Passed 1/1 tests
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Writing SMBIOS tables ...
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Loading ROMBIOS ...
> >> (XEN) HVM1: 9628 bytes of ROMBIOS high-memory extensions:
> >> (XEN) HVM1:   Relocating to 0xfc000000-0xfc00259c ... done
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Creating MP tables ...
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Loading Cirrus VGABIOS ...
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Loading PCI Option ROM ...
> >> (XEN) HVM1:  - Manufacturer: http://etherboot.org
> >> (XEN) HVM1:  - Product name: gPXE
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Loading ACPI ...
> >> (XEN) HVM1:  - Lo data: 000ea020-000ea04f
> >> (XEN) HVM1:  - Hi data: fc002800-fc0042bf
> >> (XEN) HVM1: vm86 TSS at fc004400
> >> (XEN) HVM1: BIOS map:
> >> (XEN) HVM1:  c0000-c8fff: VGA BIOS
> >> (XEN) HVM1:  c9000-d57ff: Etherboot ROM
> >> (XEN) HVM1:  eb000-eb14c: SMBIOS tables
> >> (XEN) HVM1:  f0000-fffff: Main BIOS
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Invoking ROMBIOS ...
> >> (XEN) HVM1: $Revision: 1.221 $ $Date: 2008/12/07 17:32:29 $
> >> (XEN) stdvga.c:147:d1 entering stdvga and caching modes
> >> (XEN) HVM1: VGABios $Id: vgabios.c,v 1.67 2008/01/27 09:44:12 vruppert
> >> Exp $
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Bochs BIOS - build: 06/23/99
> >> (XEN) HVM1: $Revision: 1.221 $ $Date: 2008/12/07 17:32:29 $
> >> (XEN) HVM1: Options: apmbios pcibios eltorito PMM
> >> (XEN) HVM1:
> >> (XEN) HVM1: ata1 master: QEMU DVD-ROM ATAPI-4 CD-Rom/DVD-Rom
> >> (XEN) HVM1: IDE time out
> >> (XEN) HVM1:
> >>
> >> No suspicious log is found in /var/log/xen/xend.log.
> >>
> >> I came across this problem with AMD Quad-Core Opteron(tm) 2356 on Dell
> >> PowerEdge R805.  However, this kind of problem did not happened on the
> >> another machine I use (Intel Xeon 5130).
> >>
> >> Does anybody know how to fix this problem or how to analyze it?
> >>
> >> Thank you in advance,
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Yoshisato YANAGISAWA, Ph.D.
> >> Open Source Software Computing Project
> >> NTT Cyber Space Laboratories
> >> NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
> >> 1-1 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka-Shi,
> >> Kanagawa 239-0847, Japan
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> -- 
> TAMURA, Yoshiaki
> 
> NTT Cyber Space Labs
> OSS Computing Project
> Kernel Group
> E-mail: tamura.yoshiaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> TEL: +81-46-859-2771
> FAX: +81-46-855-1152
> Address: 1-1 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka
>        Kanagawa 239-0847 JAPAN
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel