[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support
Andi Kleen wrote: Jody Belka <lists-xen@xxxxxxxx> writes:Is it duplication though? I personally have machines with older processors that don't have hvm support. I plan on keeping these around for a good amount of time, and would love to be running them on mainline. So for me, unless KVM is somehow going to support para-virtualisation, this isn't duplication.The old systems will continue to run fine with a 2.6.18 Dom0 though. But that suggests the *only* reason to update kernels is to get new hardware support. Or conversely, we should stop trying to be backwards compatible with old hardware in new kernels because there's no reason to keep it. While a lot of the delta between 2.6.18 has been hardware support updates, there have been a lot of other useful things: a new CPU scheduler, tickless operation (which directly important for virtualization), all the cgroups stuff, new filesystems, IO schedulers, etc, etc. All good things to have, even on older hardware. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |