|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Continuing problems booting
M A Young wrote: On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, M A Young wrote:On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:... (XEN) d0:v0: unhandled page fault (ec=0000) (XEN) Pagetable walk from 0000000000000028: (XEN) L4[0x000] = 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0: (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.3.1 x86_64 debug=n Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 0 (XEN) RIP: e033:[<ffffffff816c5315>]What does this correspond to in the kernel? $ gdb vmlinux (gdb) x/i 0xffffffff816c53150xffffffff816c5315 <xen_start_kernel+16>: mov %gs:0x28,%raxThis is from 0xffffffff816c5305 <xen_start_kernel>: push %rbp 0xffffffff816c5306 <xen_start_kernel+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0xffffffff816c5309 <xen_start_kernel+4>: push %rbx 0xffffffff816c530a <xen_start_kernel+5>: sub $0x18,%rsp 0xffffffff816c530e <xen_start_kernel+9>:mov 0x333e23(%rip),%rdi # 0xffffffff819f9138 <xen_start_info> Hm, yes, I guess there's something to stop stack-protector from adding stuff to xen_start_kernel(). But I'm more interested in the crash you see when you have stack protector off. What are the symptoms? J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |