[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: Compile error in KDB branch when debug=y.
Hi John, Thanks for the patch. Actually, I noticed it last week when I refreshed the tree to latest and debug was turned on by default. There are problems running kdb with debug=y, like: (XEN) Xen BUG at spinlock.c:23 *** kdb (Fatal Error on cpu:1 vec:6 Invalid Opcode): ffff828c8011b865: check_lock+3d ud2 [1]xkdb> [1]xkdb> f (XEN) [<ffff828c8011b865>] check_lock+0x3d/0x4e (XEN) [<ffff828c8011b9eb>] _spin_lock+0x11/0x24 (XEN) [<ffff828c8015bd5c>] do_settime+0x26/0x87 (XEN) [<ffff828c8015c1f5>] kdb_time_resume+0x90/0x121 (XEN) [<ffff828c801d94d4>] kdb_end_session+0x8f/0x298 (XEN) [<ffff828c801d9e3b>] kdbmain+0x75e/0x867 (XEN) [<ffff828c801d9fa2>] kdb_keyboard+0x11/0x13 (XEN) [<ffff828c80128e99>] serial_rx+0x2f/0xd8 (XEN) [<ffff828c8012a2e7>] serial_rx_interrupt+0xa9/0xbf So I'd recommend turning it off, even tho I've fixed the build break. Since I always have debug=n (with frame_pointer=yes) when I debug, I've not looked at any of these issues. BTW, I've refreshed the tree to latest, so please check it out: http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/debuggers.hg Thanks, Mukesh Emre Can Sezer wrote: > Hi Mukesh, > > Got a compile time type mismatch error from debug.c:70 when compiling > with debug=y. Below is the single line patch to fix it. > > --- xen-unstable/xen/arch/x86/debug.c 2009-02-19 14:27:02.000000000 > -0500 > +++ xen-debug/xen/arch/x86/debug.c 2009-02-18 17:26:09.000000000 -0500 > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ > } > > #if XEN_SUBVERSION >= 2 /* xen >= 3.2.x */ > - mfn = gfn_to_mfn(dp, gfn, &gfntype); > + mfn = mfn_x(gfn_to_mfn(dp, gfn, &gfntype)); > if (p2m_is_readonly(gfntype) && toaddr) { > DBGP2("kdb:p2m_is_readonly: gfntype:%x\n", gfntype); > return INVALID_MFN; > > > Cheers, > > John > > > > Mukesh Rathor wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> kdb: to debug xen hypervisor, could also debug guests >> gdbsx: to debug PV/HVM linux guests >> >> The tree is : http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/debuggers.hg >> >> See README-dbg. You'll need to setup serial access for kdb. >> >> Thanks, >> Mukesh >> >> > >> > Hi Dan, >> > >> > I'm currently using your version of ssplitd as it is. I haven't tried >> > kdb. For some reason I thought that was for debugging guest domains. >> > I'll look into it. As for resurrecting the gdbstub, I'm *NOT* familiar >> > enough >> > with it to try it myself. I do have a few people here who might be >> though. >> > I'll post something if we get it working. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > John >> > >> > Dan Doucette wrote: >> >> Hi John, >> >> >> >> The patches I submitted quickly fell out of sync with the 3.2 unstable >> >> branch at the time. I found a month or so later they stopped working, >> >> and I didnt have the time to keep them up to date. >> >> For Xen debugging, have you tried the kdb branch maintained my Mukesh >> >> Rathor (Oracle)? I used this a few months ago and it seemed to work. >> >> The branch is off the mainline, however. Its usage is documented in >> >> the xen wiki pages, I believe. >> >> >> >> If you would prefer to use gdb, the functionality should be easy to >> >> resurrect. There really wasnt much to it. >> >> I would recommend using my serial port splitter (ssplitd.c), which I >> >> found easier to use and was complete in its implementation. I >> >> submitted all the changes in proper patch form after the posting you >> >> referenced above, if you are interested. >> >> >> >> Dan. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Emre Can Sezer <ecsezer@xxxxxxxx >> >> <mailto:ecsezer@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm trying to debug Xen remotely using serial port. I followed >> >> the instructions on the following post made in this xen-devel >> list: >> >> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-12/msg00678.html >> >> >> >> I was able to connect gdb but I ran into a problem where even >> >> after I clear all the breakpoints, execution traps into gdb with >> >> SIGTRAP at restore_all_xen(). This only happens if I set a >> >> breakpoint and then try to continue after hitting the break point. >> >> If I simply connect gdb but continue without setting any >> >> breakpoints, everything is OK. >> >> >> >> The post mentions some stability issues and I haven't seen any >> >> follow ups. Is this still a viable debugging method? Or is there >> >> some other method I should try? >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> >> >> John >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Xen-devel mailing list >> >> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |