[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough
Simon Horman writes ("[rfc 00/18] ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough"): > This series starts of with servaral cleanup patches. Many of these patches are cosmetic or cleanup changes to code which is identical in upstream qemu and in qemu-xen-unstable. These are not really things which I want to commit directly into the Xen tree; we try to minimise the differences between the Xen qemu and upstream. If you would like to clean up the upstream qemu code then by all means submit your changes to the qemu-devel mailing list as patches against upstream qemu. I'd be happy to give you some pointers (feel free to email me privately) and engage with you on the qemu-devel list. If your changes are accepted by upstream we'll get them in due course, when I merge. If you do consider submitting upstream you might consider lumping your changes together rather more, so that a single patch covers each set of similar changes to different files appears. > The meat of the changes start with the patch > "ioemu: use devfn instead of slots as the unit for passthrough" I'd be interested to hear the opinions on this proposal of other developers of the passthrough support. Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |