Re: [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] xen ocaml tools

[Patrick Colp <pjcolp@xxxxxxxxx>]

I've cleaned up the attack code (and added copy right info), Makefile, and 
README a bit for the attack. Please find the revised version attached.
Patrick


Patrick Colp wrote:
> Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> > Patrick Colp wrote:
> > > I'm really excited to see somebody else working on an OCaml XenStore! 
> > > I was wondering if you could tell me what the difference are between 
> > > this implementation and the one I recently released to the community?
> > >   
> > this is a bit hard to tell without testing your version.
> >
> > but i think the main difference is the way we handle transactions, 
> > which should provide a stable average time to commit transactions when 
> > having lots of xenstore traffic from guests.
> I think you're thinking of my initial release last year. The version I 
> released a few months ago also has an in-memory store and greatly 
> improved transactions. It was motivated by the need to survive things 
> like DoS attacks.
> I wrote a little attack program (in OCaml) which runs from any DomU and 
> brought the original xenstored to its knees. With the attack going, it's 
> impossible to bring a new domain up -- it just hangs forever attempting 
> to bring it up. Basically, the attack just hammers xenstored with 
> micro-transactions. With the original transaction system, which allows 
> the first committing transaction in a generation to win, long 
> transactions could never complete. I implemented transactions that would 
> enable all concurrent but non-conflicting transactions to commit. This 
> made my version of xenstored resilient to the attack.
> I played around with this with your version too, but found that, while 
> it would not hang forever while attempting to load a domain, it would 
> instead die after a few seconds with the following error:
> Error: (2, 'No such file or directory')
>
> I tried with with the eagain mode thing (random dropping of 1/3 of all 
> transactions) both enabled and disabled, but it had the same effect 
> (except that with the mode enabled, 1/3 of all transactions would fail 
> regardless of if they should or not).
> I've been reading over your code and noticed that you seem to have a 
> mini-implementation of libxc. I was wondering why you chose to do this 
> over using the pre-existing libxenctrl? Does this make the final 
> executable smaller?
> Patrick
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Attachment: attack.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel