Re: [Xen-devel] Xen with dom0 pvops on ultra-recent "git tip" kernel on x86_64

["Marc - A. Dahlhaus" <mad@xxxxxx>]

Pasi Kärkkäinen schrieb:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:28:59PM +0100, Christophe Saout wrote:
>   
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> >     
> > > > I am very excited to see that dom0 pvops is finally coming close to
> > > > working, so I wanted to give it a try.
> > > >
> > > > >From the description it was not clear to me which kernel to chose as
> > > > base for the patches.hg, so I took the latest (that was ~ 2 weeks ago)
> > > > kernel on git.kernel.org I could find (post-2.6.28 git tip at that
> > > > point).
> > > >   
> > > >         
> > > Just follow the instructions on this wiki page:
> > >
> > > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
> > >
> > > You could also search the Archives of xen-devel beginning around 
> > > November 2008 for more
> > > informations...
> > >       
> > Yes, I followed those instruction (or at least I believe I did).  It is
> > however not specific as to which kernel version from the "tip.git" to
> > use as base for applying the patches.  I mean, that is not really my
> > problem, I got everything applied and have a compiling kernel. It just
> > doesn't boot (or at least doesn't get as far as for instance Pasi and
> > his experiments).
> >
> >     
> pv_ops dom0 patches are currently for 2.6.28-rc8. 
>
> I think and hope Jeremy will update them when he gets back from his vacation
> next week. 
>
>   
> > Actually, I am not really interested in getting a working kernel (I know
> > that there are still some pieces missing), so this is purely academical
> > and for testing.  Since the patches are supposed to be merged soon (at
> > least I got the impression that was the plan) I though I was going to
> > join the testing effort.  And at this point they are supposed to sort of
> > work on any bleeding edge kernel, right?  So I took one.
> >
> > I could have gone back in the history and take something around
> > 2.6.28-rc8 (which seemed to have worked for others), but then they were
> > using x86_32 and I am testing x86_64, if I see correctly.  So my
> > question was mostly if this had seen some testing at all, is supposed to
> > work, and if it is, did I miss something.  In any case, this is the
> > result of my testing. :-)
> >
> >     
> I think some people have been trying x86-64 too, with similar results than
> me and others on x86-32.
>   
> > I also forward-ported a few things to the latest version a few hours
> > ago, including some changes in xen-iommu.c to follow the dma_ops merging
> > thing in the tip head.
> >
> >     
> Nice.
>
> I also just noticed there are some new patches in
> http://xenbits.xen.org/paravirt_ops/patches.hg/
>
> "Fixes for PAE swiotlb with Becky's patches."
>
> Maybe I should try and see if those make any difference.
>   
My testing included this changeset already. But it changed nothing on 
the symptoms here, hope you get better results.

Marc

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel