[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 0/3]Enable CMCI (Corrected Machine Check Error Interrupt) for Intel CPUs
>-----Original Message----- >From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: 2008年12月24日 16:02 >To: Jiang, Yunhong; Ke, Liping >Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 0/3]Enable CMCI (Corrected >Machine Check Error Interrupt) for Intel CPUs > >On 24/12/2008 02:57, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> As for your proposal of do it before the stop_machine_run(), >it may reduce the >> window, but still can't eliminate the window of lost CMCI >interrupt, unless we >> do similar thing in the cmci_cpu_down() (i.e. all CPU is >irq_disabled before >> update the CMCI status). It is the same if we pull the >notifier chain to Xen. >> How is your idea? > >You only need hardirqs disabled, so rendezvous within an on_each_cpu() >callback is sufficient for you. You don't need to get intimate with >stop_machine_run()! Yes, that's what I mean of "do similar thing in the cmci_cpu_down()". We placed it in stop_machine_run() because it has rendezvous all CPU already :$ > > -- Keir > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |