[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: about fixup_page_fault
On 17/12/2008 10:53, "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At 09:04 +0000 on 17 Dec (1229504644), Keir Fraser wrote: >> A Xen fault shouldn't cause a lookup in guest tables for HVM guests. > > Looks like it does, though. :( The check in fixup_page_fault should > probably be more like: But wouldn't this just cause an infinite loop? Since shadow code would fix up the fault in the guest shadow tables, which the hypervisor is not running on? -- Keir > if ( (paging_mode_external(d) && guest_mode(regs)) > || (paging_mode_enabled(d) && !paging_mode_external(d)) ) > > That is, unconditionally call paging_fault() for PV guests (who > shouldn't be allowed map the 0 page, right?), and call for HVM guests > only if the guest caused the fault. > > Potentially it can all be tidied up a bit by moving the other > HVM-specific call out of the if (IN_HYPERVISOR_RANGE) block at the top. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |