Re: [Xen-devel] NR_PIRQS vs. NR_IRQS

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 19/11/08 15:55, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Is fixing this actually any harder than just bumping NR_IRQS/NR_PIRQS in Xen
>> and NR_PIRQS in Linux? Have IRQS and VECTORS got somehow accidentally tied
>> together in Xen?
> 
> Unfortunately there was some mix-up. But I think I got this fixed (running
> a NR_IRQS=1024 hypervisor at the moment). I'd prefer to submit these
> patches only after your NR_PIRQS -> NR_IRQS change comes out of the
> staging tree though, to make sure it applies (and works) correctly on top
> of it.

Okay, I manually synced the tree. I've been meaning to do so for a while.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel