[Xen-devel] RE: About pit irq

["Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>]

>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 4:50 PM
>
>On 19/11/08 08:22, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I see. Yes, a slower tick is better since maximum overflow for
>> pit ch2 is about 54ms, and xen has already be a tickless
>> model.
>
>Most systems will have ACPI PM or HPET timer though, right? Does PIT
>platform timer inefficiency matter? Hacking on it more is a pain.
>
> -- Keir
>

Agree.

Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel