[Xen-devel] RE: The memory type of non-RAM address is WB by default?

["Su, Disheng" <disheng.su@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Keir,
        Please apply the attached patch again...
        p2m_is_ram is better than mfn_valid:)
Su, Disheng wrote:
> Hi Keir/Dexuan,
>       Attached the patch, which only checks the conflict in RAM range.
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 23/10/08 11:24, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> Keir Fraser wrote:
>>>> Well, one approach would be not to warn! :-)
>>>> 
>>>> Seriously: for anything which is not guest RAM, the host should
>>>> really know best what memory type it should be mapped as (probably
>>>> UC or WC). Hence why mess around validating a guest-requested
>>>> memory type?
>>> This method looks good. I'll try to make a patch.
>> 
>> Thanks. I agree this is probably the best approach.
>> 
>>  -- Keir
> 
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Disheng, Su



Best Regards,
Disheng, Su

Attachment: check_ram_address_only.patch
Description: check_ram_address_only.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel