 
	
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [Question] Do we need to support devices that do not strictly follow the PCI-e specification?
 Hi, Keir, When debugging recently, I found some devices that did not follow the PCI-e specification strictly. Below is an example. From PCI-e spec, PCI-e capability occupies 0x3c bytes of configuration space. Unimplemented registers are reserved and hardwired to zero. But for device listed below, PCI-e capability should begin at 0x4C and end at 0x88. But this device implements MSI,
VPD, MSI-X capabilities in the reserved spaces. Current code can not handle this. My question is do we need to add hacks to handle such kinds of devices?  Here is the output of lspci: 03:00.0 Fibre Channel: QLogic Corp. ISP2432-based 4Gb Fibre Channel to PCI Express HBA (rev 03)         Subsystem: QLogic Corp. Unknown device 0138         Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-         Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-         Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 18         Region 0: I/O ports at 3000 [disabled] [size=256]         Region 1: Memory at d8500000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=16K]         [virtual] Expansion ROM at d8800000 [disabled] [size=256K]         Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2                 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)                 Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-         Capabilities: [4c] Express Endpoint IRQ 0                 Device: Supported: MaxPayload 1024 bytes, PhantFunc 0, ExtTag-                 Device: Latency L0s <4us, L1 <1us                 Device: AtnBtn+ AtnInd+ PwrInd+                 Device: Errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-                 Device: RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+                 Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes                 Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x4, ASPM L0s, Port 0                 Link: Latency L0s <4us, L1 unlimited                 Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 64 bytes CommClk- ExtSynch-                 Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x4         Capabilities: [64] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/4 Enable-                 Address: 00000000fee00000  Data: 40b9         Capabilities: [74] Vital Product Data         Capabilities: [7c] MSI-X: Enable- Mask- TabSize=16                 Vector table: BAR=1 offset=00002000                 PBA: BAR=1 offset=00003000 00: 77 10 32 24 00 00 10 00 03 00 04 0c 08 00 80 00 10: 01 30 00 00 04 00 50 d8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 77 10 38 01 30: 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 01 00 00 40: 00 00 00 00 01 4c 02 00 00 00 00 00 10 64 01 00 50: 83 71 00 00 10 28 00 00 41 e4 03 00 00 00 41 10 60: 00 00 00 00 05 74 88 00 00 00 e0 fe 00 00 00 00 70: b9 40 00 00 03 7c 00 80 82 2e 00 50 11 00 0f 00 80: 01 20 00 00 01 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Best Regards Shan Haitao _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
 
 | 
|  | Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |