[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Secondary bus reset for VT-d device

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Neo Jia" <neojia@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:33:47 -0700
Cc: "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:34:10 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=FwKGWZbeN8oQyQypWSdtgWfP8jtWqiG0EF92WbO6qdGIKgslIT45DyHjLreIcMTMoM 0dyhq92cMypnS0PLiwXD6A6doH+wBFRCpydhI88ffPyZZ+4hknyyIFfYIfmZsusa2HdL fOa1We+ix88ajFdQqhY43A4HkLggLPnLf9cAE=
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

hi,

Did the current Xen in unstable branch already support the secondary
bus reset for VT-d devices?

Thanks,
Neo
-- 
I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious
probably today we haven't the technology we are using!

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [Xen-devel] Secondary bus reset for VT-d device
  - From: Cui, Dexuan

Prev by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.3.0 - Assertion '!((irq_stat[(((get_cpu_info()->processor_id)))].__local_irq_count) != 0)' failed at xmalloc.c:180
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] Secondary bus reset for VT-d device
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix datamodel-graph of XenAPI
Next by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Secondary bus reset for VT-d device
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.