Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions

["Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 15.08.08 15:01 >>>
>On 15/8/08 13:15, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I can't really explain the results of testing with this version of the patch:
>> While the number of false wakeups got further reduced by somewhat
>> less than 20%, both time spent in the kernel and total execution time
>> went up (8% and 4% respectively) compared to my original (and from
>> all I can tell worse) version of the patch. Nothing else changed as far as
>> I'm aware.
>
>That is certainly odd. Presumably consistent across a few runs? I can't
>imagine where extra time would be being spent though...

Yes, I did at least five runs in each environment.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel