[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A	BUGOR...)
 
 
Hi Bryan, 
According to our tests using the latest xen-unstable, the assignment of 
SATA controller (like in AHCI mode or Enhanced mode) should be OK on 
the DQ35 platform. 
  
For xen-unstable, I 
guess you didn't specify "iommu=1" in the Xen grub entry? By default, VT-d is 
not enabled in the latest xen-unstable. 
  
Thanks, -- 
Dexuan 
   
Hello, Thanks for the information. I'm trying to forward a 
PCI express SATA/PATA controller with a JMicron chipset. ( Info 
here.) I know there have been problems with graphics cards in general, but I 
thought it was possible with disk controllers? Is there a list of well supported 
hardware (disk controllers) that can be used for VT-d? Also, your RMRR 
explanation makes sense for the mercurial 3.2-testing, but what about 
xen-unstable? I didn't see any errors there besides "I/O Virtualisation 
disabled" with no other reason listed. Thanks so much for your help on 
this. I will also try removing the disk controller and see if the mercurial 
Xen-3.2-testing boots without RMRR errors. Regards, -Bryan
 On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Han, Weidong  <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
 
  
  Hi 
  Bryan, 
    
  I think you 
  are using an add-on graphic card (iGfx disabled), right? We also met this 
  issue before. Obviously it's a BIOS issue (RMRR is incorrect). When 
  parsing apci dmar failed, VT-d will 
  be disabled. 
    
  Randy 
  (Weidong) 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Hello, 
  I'm also seeing this exact same problem. I've posted on xen-users, but did 
  not get an answer. Venkat seems to be experiencing the same problem as me. I 
  have the latest BIOS for my motherboard DQ35JO. (BIOS ver 933) I'm running a 
  Q6600 as well. It hangs at "Brought up 4 CPUs." I've tried all sorts of 
  combinations of Xen versions and kernels to get this working. And, yes, VT and 
  VT-d are enabled in my BIOS.
  
  1) CentOS 5.2 SRPMS compiled with Xen 3.2.1. Adding pci=nommconf does not get it to boot.
  
  2) Mercurial Xen-3.2-testing. Here, after adding pci=nommconf, I get: 
  (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:441: RMRR is incorrect. (XEN) Failed to parse ACPI 
  DMAR.  Disabling VT-d. (XEN) [VT-D]ACPI DMAR:No DMAR devices found 
  3) Mercurial Xen-unstable, I get "I/O Virtualisation disabled" I can't find 
  any reason why this is the case. VT-D is not enabled. 
  I would really like to find the cause for this. I don't know if this is a 
  BIOS bug or what. This board is supposedly supported on Xen per the VT-D wiki. 
  Other people seem to have the same problem as me: 
  http://forums12.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/bizsupport/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1217898320366+28353475&threadId=1234588 
  Thanks for any and all help, 
  -Bryan
    
  
  
  The BIOS version I use may be not the exact one as yours. I mean I expect 
  you're not using a very old BIOS. :-)  
  How about trying the xen 3.2.2-rc2 and the latest xen-unstable first? There 
  are some VT-d bug fixes between 3.2.1 (you're using it) and 3.2.2-rc2. 
   
  Thanks,  
  -- Dexuan  
  
  ________________________________  
  From: Kumar, Venkat [mailto:Venkat.Kumar@xxxxxxx] Sent: 2008年8月5日 14:37 To: Cui, 
  Dexuan; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: 
  [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A 
  BUG OR...)  
  If you don't mind can you send me the BIOS version you are using?  
  Thx,  
  Venkat  
  ================================  
  Venkata Kumar Duvvuru,  
  LSI Engenio,  
  Adv. Development,  
  Bangalore.  
  Mob: +91-9880318542  
  Off : +91-80-41978700 ( Extn : 3544 )  
  
  ================================   
  
  ________________________________  
  From: Cui, Dexuan [mailto:dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 
  12:03 PM To: Kumar, Venkat; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: 
  [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A 
  BUG OR...)  
  Hi Venkat,  
  Can you confirm you're using the latest BIOS? Can you try the xen 3.2.2-rc2 
  and the latest xen-unstable on the same host?  
  I have the similar host. Xen 3.2.2-rc2 and the latest xen-unstable both 
  work well on it.  
  Thanks,  
  -- Dexuan  
  
  ________________________________  
  From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
  Kumar, Venkat Sent: 2008年8月5日 12:21 To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Xen-devel] 
  Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A BUG OR...)  
  After building Xen-3.2.1 I could successfully boot into it if I avoid 
  giving vtd=1 as the boot parameter.  
  If I pass vtd=1 as the boot parameter to xen, the system hangs while 
  booting.  
  The system hangs after the following messages  
  ============================  
  Boot messages  
  [XEN]…..  
  [Xen] Brought up 2 CPUs...  
  =========================  
  My chipset DQ35 series is having VT-d support and is enabled in the 
  BIOS as well.  
  My domain0 is CentOS-5.2(2.6.18.8-xen).  
  Is this a possible bug or some thing else??  
  Any Idea??  
  Thx,  
             
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 
    
     |