RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Various VT-d code cleanup

["Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, my previous statement is not correct. I want to say: system may
have more than one PCI segments (IOH), so the INCLUDE_ALL DRHD may be
not at the last of all other DRHDs.

Randy (Weidong)

Han, Weidong wrote:
> System may have more than one PCI segments (IOH), so it's possible
> there are more than one INCLUDE_ALL DRHDs. 
> 
> Randy (Weidong)
> 
> Espen Skoglund wrote:
>> Hmmm... The VT-d spec (Section 8.3) states that the INCLUDE_ALL DRHD
>> strcuture must be enumerated after all other DRHD structures for
>> that PCI segment. 
>> 
>>      eSk
>> 
>> 
>> [Weidong Han]
>>> There is only one INCLUDE_ALL DMAR unit in system, but no
>>> restriction on whether it's the last unit.
>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel