[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] ioemu: alternative patch fixing pt_chk_bar_overlap
> Ah, yes. I did try to apply it but it didn't quite apply cleanly. > > If it's important then we need to clean this up. The reason why the patch can not be applied to ioemu-remote is "pci_config_passthrough_with_msi_msix.patch" I submitted has not been applied to ioemu-remote yet. I've created new patch for ioemu-remote. If you apply it to ioemu-remote, the implementation of passthrough device will become almost the same for both ioemu trees. The patch contains following patches which have been applied to Xen Unstable Changeset 17959-18076. pci_config_passthrough_with_msi_msix.patch [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Support more Capability Structures (including MSI/MSI-X) and Device Specific Registers for pt device. Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:26:52 +0900 fix_pt_iomap.patch Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Support more Capability Structures (including MSI/MSI-X) and Device Specific Registers for pt device. NISHIGUCHI Naoki <nisiguti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:14:55 +0900 fix_pt_bar_mapping.patch [Xen-devel] [PATCH] ioemu: pass-through: pt_bar_mapping fix NISHIGUCHI Naoki <nisiguti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:46:15 +0900 fix_hot-remove.patch [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix issues when passthrough device is hot-removed from HVM domain Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:20:11 +0900 chk_bar_overlap_bugfix.patch [Xen-devel] [PATCH] ioemu: alternative patch fixing pt_chk_bar_overlap Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:05:11 +0900 Thanks Signed-off-by: Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Yuji Shimada On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:54:14 +0100 Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jean Guyader writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] ioemu: alternative patch fixing > pt_chk_bar_overlap"): > > This code was parted of the FLR patch, I don't think this patch has been > > merged with the ioemu-remote. > > Ah, yes. I did try to apply it but it didn't quite apply cleanly. > > If it's important then we need to clean this up. > > Since people have started submitting patches to qemu (aka > ioemu-remote) separately from xen-unstable, and similar things are > getting committed to both, it's not really practical now for me to do > a bulk merge from xen-unstable. > > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel Attachment:
pci_config_passthrough_ioemu-remote.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |