RE: [Xen-devel] Problems with the new ioemu

["Dugger, Donald D" <donald.d.dugger@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ignoring the fact that `git pull' in the `ioemu-remote' directory did nothing, 
just said:

Already up-to-date.

--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Donald.D.Dugger@xxxxxxxxx
Ph: (303)443-3786 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
>Dugger, Donald D
>Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:16 PM
>To: Jean Guyader
>Cc: Li, Haicheng; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
>ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Samuel Thibault
>Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Problems with the new ioemu
>
>So the top level makefile does a `git pull' if the 
>`ioemu-remote' directory doesn't exist but it doesn't do the 
>pull if it does?  That seems a little inconsistent.
>
>Also, I thought the purpose of `make distclean' was to remove 
>everything that wasn't part of the tree, especially given that 
>it will remove the Linux kernel subtree shouldn't it also 
>remove the `ioemu-remote' directory?
>
>--
>Don Dugger
>"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
>Donald.D.Dugger@xxxxxxxxx
>Ph: (303)443-3786 
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jean Guyader [mailto:jean.guyader@xxxxxxxxx] 
>>Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:59 PM
>>To: Dugger, Donald D
>>Cc: Samuel Thibault; Li, Haicheng; 
>>xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Problems with the new ioemu
>>
>>You should do a git pull inside ioemu-remote.
>>
>>On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Dugger, Donald D
>><donald.d.dugger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I'll let Haicheng comment on the I/O request, that's really 
>>his bug not mine.
>>>
>>> in re: GCC v. 4 - I just did a `hg pull' (changeset: 
>>18074:23208dc42cfe), `make distclean && make' and got the same 
>>error, it still requires GCC v. 3.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Don Dugger
>>> "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
>>> Donald.D.Dugger@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Ph: (303)443-3786
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>>>>Samuel Thibault
>>>>Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 2:40 PM
>>>>To: Dugger, Donald D
>>>>Cc: Li, Haicheng; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>>ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Problems with the new ioemu
>>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>Which version are you using?  Some of the errors you are reporting
>>>>should have been fixed by now:
>>>>
>>>>Dugger, Donald D, le Thu 17 Jul 2008 13:34:48 -0700, a écrit :
>>>>> I/O request not ready: 0, ptr: 0, port: 0, data: 0, count: 
>>0, size: 0
>>>>> (qemu) Failed allocation for dom 18: 2048 extents of order 0
>>>>> Failed to populate physmap
>>>>
>>>>Should be fixed
>>>>
>>>>> Issue4: cannot compile with GCC v. 4, `make' fails with:
>>>>> WARNING: "gcc" looks like gcc 4.x
>>>>> Looking for gcc 3.x
>>>>> gcc 3.x not found!
>>>>
>>>>Should be fixed.
>>>>
>>>>Samuel
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>Jean Guyader
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel