[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu-xen: Fix PV segfault
John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:38:32AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >> While I'm at it: There is a patch queue with at >> http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/patches/ >> >> The plan is to submit that stuff upstream, so regular qemu will have xen >> support. Right now the patch queue has only paravirt bits. It comes > > I'm confused, I thought that was the point of the qemu-xen tree Looked at the qemu-xen tree and the branches therein today (missed the original announcement as I was on vacation at that point in time). Ian's plan seems to be to upstream mostly bugfixes (qemu branch), not any xen-specific code. I also want to have the xen bits upstream (pv first as mentioned in the previous mail). And I want to have it as runtime option, not compile-time option, so you don't have a separate qemu-dm binary. cheers, Gerd -- http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |