Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Support more Capability Structures andDevice Specific

[Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am going to release these following patches.

    1. the patch supporting MSI Capability Structure for Xen Unstable.
       (list.h will be removed. some bugs will be fixed.)

    2. the patch supporting MSI-X Capability Structure for Xen Unstable.

    3. the patch against the upstream qemu merge (including MSI/MSI-X
       Capability Structure).

Should I release patch against the upstream qemu merge prior to Xen
Unstable ?
We'd be very happy if you could help me merged that patch, so that I can
concentrate on MSI/MSI-X patches.

Thanks.

--
Yuji Shimada

On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:55:01 +0100
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Support more Capability 
> Structures andDevice Specific"):
> > Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Support more Capability 
> > Structures andDevice Specific"):
> > > What do you think of Yuji's patch? One thing to consider is that
> > > perhaps the patch should be against the upstream qemu merge
> > > now. But I'm not sure that PCI passthrough is even supported yet
> > > in that tree (Ian?).
> > 
> > In theory PCI passthrough is supposed to be supported in my merged
> > tree.  But, I haven't tested it yet so I doubt it works.
> 
> I should expand on that.  I'd very much like for these kind of patches
> to be going into the merged qemu tree now, and I'd also like people to
> help test it.
> 
> So it would be very good if people who actually use PCI passthrough
> were to take a look at the merged qemu tree.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel