[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support
Ingo Molnar wrote: * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:No, looks like my fault. The non-PARAVIRT version of paravirt_pgd_free() is:It quickly broke the build in testing: include/asm/pgalloc.h: In function âparavirt_pgd_free': include/asm/pgalloc.h:14: error: parameter name omittedarch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S: In file included from arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c:51:include/asm/pgalloc.h: In function âparavirt_pgd_free':include/asm/pgalloc.h:14: error: parameter name omittedstatic inline void paravirt_pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *) {} but C doesn't like missing parameter names, even if unused. This should fix it:that fixed the build but now we've got a boot crash with this config: time.c: Detected 2010.304 MHz processor. spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000 IP: [<0000000000000000>] PGD 0 Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted Oops: 0010 [1] SMP CPU 0 What stage during boot? I'm seeing an initrd problem, but that's relatively late. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |