Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] ioemu block device extent checks

["Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 04:38:24PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
> When a block device read or write request is made by an HVM guest,
> nothing checks that the request is within the range supported by the
> block backend driver in ioemu, but the code in the backend driver
> typically assumes that the request is sensible.
> 
> Depending on the backend, this can allow the guest to read and write
> arbitrary memory locations in qemu, and possibly gain control over the
> qemu process, escaping from the virtualisation.
> 
> 
> I have demonstrated to my own satisfaction that there is problem,
> using a modified Linux kernel as a guest with an instrumented CVS head
> qemu.  I haven't yet reproduced the bug with xen-unstable but I think
> it's almost certainly there too.  I have prepared a patch which I have
> checked prevents my test case, and adjusted it to fit and compile
> against xen-unstable.  I'm subjecting it to some testing as I write.

FYI, this patch causes massive unrecoverable data loss / corruption on
QCow2 files. The checks themselves are OK in terms of the first level
of bdrv_* calls from the guest. The qcow driver though calls back into
the raw driver for performing I/O on its underlying file. The qcow 
driver relies on this file being grow-on-demand for purposes of allocating
new qcow sectors. The safety checks cause this allocation to fail and
it all goes downhill from there :-(  

Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel