[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] is there any way to avoid lazy updates to pageattribute bits?
> Also, I removed the use of recursive page tables so that I could use > writeable page tables - not realizing that wr pts were a dud. I've > disabled writeable page tables and have tried re-enabling the use of > recursive page tables. It appears that that doesn't work at all any > more - is that correct? I'm not sure what you mean. You can write directly to pagetables, the write will just be emulated. It was only the 'unhooking' optimization (known as wr_pt) that was removed in 3.1, there's no guest-visible API change. You can of course used the batched mmu_update hypercall interface or the update_va_mapping hypercall. Recursive pagetables have been observed to work for a number of different guest types (including 64b and PAE) so I've no reason to believe they're broken. Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |