[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] kbdif
Markus Armbruster, le Thu 14 Feb 2008 09:42:04 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Is there a reason for requiring fb and kbd to be initialised "in > > parallel"? I mean, hw/xenfb.c requires the kbd to be created, then > > the fb to be created, then the kbd to be initialized, then the fb to be > > initialized, then the kbd to be connected, then the fb to be connected. > > > > I would have thought that creating/initializing/connecting kbd first and > > then eventually fb would be allowed. > > Any problems with this execution order? Yes: in the code I'm currently writing I have kbd_dev = init_kbdfront(nodename); fb_dev = init_fbfront(nodename, width, height, etc.); And this can't work currently, I instead have to run init_kbdfront and init_fbfront in threads so as to get them running in parallel. Samuel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |