[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Add stubdomain support
On 11/2/08 19:21, "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> You hack the libxc headers a bit: is this because you need different >> definitions of certain things in minios environment (seems unlikely for >> things like memory barriers and page sizes) or because of namespace >> conflicts? > > Conflicts. Actually they get defined to the same things... Maybe we > could have these go to public Xen headers so as to be simply shared. It's not really for Xen to define processor-architectural stuff. I'd rather just clean up libxc's namespace usage. Or perhaps it is more appropriate to clean up stubdom's -- it's private architectural definitions shouldn't be leaking into code that includes stubdom's public high-level headers. libxc's namespace should largely be its own playground. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |