[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Disable Xen PowerNow! support on Opteron2nd gen and earlier processors
> Are we in fact talking about the new Barcelona chips? If so, their > frequency settings are independent per core. Unless I have > misunderstood the question. That shouldn't be an issue either way. Ian > Shingoshi > > > > > > Keir Fraser wrote: > > On 25/1/08 22:58, "Mark Langsdorf" <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx> > <mailto:mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I tried this suggestion and also implemented the trace > function in > cpu_frequency_change() and local_time_calibration() you > suggested in > a previous message. > > It made no discernable difference in my tests. I did high > to low > and low to high changes roughly every five minutes, and > always got > an excessive difference inside of Xen and usually got error > messages > in Linux. > > > > It's a bit confusing as to what is going on since there are 4 > CPUs in the > system. Are arbitrary or all CPUs changing frequency, or just one > of them? > Is the single-step PSTATE_CTRL MSR being used, or the multi-step > FID_VID > method where voltage adjustments are under software control? What > is the > system's CPU topology, and do any of the cores have their > frequency controls > tied together? > > It'd be useful to have each tracing line stamped with the CPU > that it comes > from. As it is the tracing looks very suspect because the > systimes on > adjacent lines are much less than one second, and calibration is > supposed to > happen no more than once per second. > > -- Keir > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |