[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] pass-through PCI device hotplug support
On 24/1/08 18:06, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IMHO we shouldn't have a 'd' on the front of the command names. VT-d is a > vendor specific implementation whose nomenculture doesn't need to be exposed > to users. In addition the existing block & network hotplug commands use > 'attach' and 'detach' for their command names. So for sake of consistency > I'd recommend command names of: > > pci-list > pci-attach > pci-detach > > I think it is useful to use the same unique naming & data for both attach and > detach operations. So if we use a (bus,slot,func) triple for attachment, I > think we should use the same (bus,slot,func) triple for detachment too, > rather than having to make apps / users lookup the dynamically-allocated > 'ID' value for the device. Seconded. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |