|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: linux c/s 391
On 21/1/08 09:59, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The comment in the first hunk of that patch contradicts the added code: > mdelay() is a busy wait loop, i.e. CPU consumption is getting worse. Is it > possible that msleep() or msleep_interruptible() was meant to be used > here? Yes. > Additionally, since blktap was derived from blkback, shouldn't a similar > change bo done there? Yes. -- Keir > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |