[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] linux: {start, stop}_hz_timer() not really affecting periodic timer?

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:32:41 +0000
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:32:35 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Shouldn't these two functions call VCPUOP_set_periodic_timer/
VCPUOP_stop_periodic_timer to actually do what their names promise?

And shouldn't the call to VCPUOP_set_singleshot_timer permit -ETIME
without BUG()?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] linux: {start, stop}_hz_timer() not really affecting periodic timer?
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.1.3 and Linux Kernel 2.6.18.8
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] linux: {start, stop}_hz_timer() not really affecting periodic timer?
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Isolated Device Domain and I/O Spaces in Xen 3
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] linux: {start, stop}_hz_timer() not really affecting periodic timer?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.