[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] x86_emulate(): forgot to generate_exception_if() for 0xff?
Why do you think that? Grp4 only defines valid opcodes for reg==000b and 001b. Grp5 defines valid opcodes for all except reg=111b. So the current code seems correct. -- Keir On 19/12/07 09:34, "Liu, Eric E" <eric.e.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > In arch/x86/x86_emulate.c: x86_emulate(): > 1716 case 0xfe: /* Grp4 */ > 1717 generate_exception_if((m odrm_reg & 7) >= 2, EXC_UD); > 1718 case 0xff: /* Grp5 */ > 1719 switch ( modrm_reg & 7 ) > 1720 { > 1721 case 0: /* inc */ > 1722 emulate_1op("inc", dst, _regs.eflags); > 1723 break; > 1724 case 1: /* dec */ > 1725 emulate_1op("dec", dst, _regs.eflags); > 1726 break; > > Here we only check 0xfe for "reg >= 2"? I think we should also check > 0xff -- we should swap line 1717 and 1718? > > Thanks! > --Eric (Liu, Feng) > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |