[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Double mapping of iomem assertion
On 19/10/07 08:13, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This was introduced by xen changeset 14731, back in April. So Jan is to >> blame (and me, I suppose!). ;-) I expect it's in a few vendor kernels at >> this point... > > Indeed, I didn't consider this situation. However, excluding the check > against current->mm here was on purpose (and hence I'm not certain > your adding of it was correct) - when used on user mappings, > ptep_get_and_clear() is expected to return the most up-to-date A/D > flags, which cannot be achieved through a hypercall. On the contrary, > the use(s) with init_mm never have such expectations as far as I > recall, they at best check the returned value for validity/presence/null. Ah, that's true... I'll fix the fix. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |