RE: [Xen-devel] [NEO 1:1] Nativedom 1:1 Mapping

["Guy Zana" <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I sent the patch for review (not for inclusion).
I know you are not very fond of the E820_1TO1 addition.

You mean it would be cleaner to mark these 1:1 chunks as reserved? Or do you 
suggest to do that completely differently?
Can you elaborate on that please?

Thanks,
Guy. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 10:29 AM
> To: Guy Zana; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [NEO 1:1] Nativedom 1:1 Mapping 
> 
> On 21/9/07 08:46, "Guy Zana" <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The patch may contain small vt-d code chunks, these got in 
> because of 
> > the merge, please disregard them for now.
> 
> The patch at least needs to be cleaned up and a signed-off-by 
> line added for it to be considered for inclusion. Also as you 
> know I don't like the
> E820_1TO1 addition, and I think this can be implemented 
> without touching the common page_alloc.c.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel