[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature
- To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:55:50 +0100
- Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:52:29 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
- Thread-index: AcfbG3xWuqv8MkcOEdylHQAWy6hiGQ==
- Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature
Did you check the signature on all three mappings, and only the first time you mapped it was broken? Weird.
-- Keir
On 9/8/07 18:54, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(XEN) (2) Mapped 0x3ffcfec0 to fff9bec0
(XEN) ACPI: Invalid FADT signature A__ADR
That one is bad. It has a bad signature! First call.
(XEN) (2) Mapped 0x3ffcfec0 to fff9bec0
(XEN) ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x588
2nd call. This one is good! POrt is also good.
(XEN) (2) Mapped 0x3ffcfd80 to fff9bd80
(XEN) ACPI: ACPI SLEEP INFO: pm1x_cnt[584,0], pm1x_evt[580,0]
(XEN) wakeup_vec[3ffcfd8c], vec_size[20]
(XEN) (2) Mapped 0x3ffcfec0 to fff9bec0
(XEN) ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x588
3rd call. This one is also good!
Looks like the mapping does not work correctly.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
