|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Many same managed domain
>At 06:09 22/07/2007, Masaki Kanno wrote: >>Hi, >> >>When I tested xm new command without uuid parameter repeatedly, >>I saw many same managed domain as follows. >> >># xm list >>Name ID Mem >>VCPUs State Time(s) >>Domain-0 0 941 2 r----- >>51.9 >># xm new /xen/vm1.conf >>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf". >># xm new /xen/vm1.conf >>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf". >># xm new /xen/vm1.conf >>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf". >># xm list >>Name ID Mem >>VCPUs State Time(s) >>Domain-0 0 941 2 r----- >>56.3 >>vm1 256 1 >> 0.0 >>vm1 256 1 >> 0.0 >>vm1 256 1 >> 0.0 >> >> >>But, when I tested xm new command with uuid parameter repeatedly, >>I did not see same managed domain as follows. >> >># xm list >>Name ID Mem >>VCPUs State Time(s) >>Domain-0 0 941 2 r----- >>69.9 >># xm new /xen/vm1.conf uuid="aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee" >>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf". >># xm new /xen/vm1.conf uuid="aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee" >>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf". >># xm new /xen/vm1.conf uuid="aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee" >>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf". >># xm list >>Name ID Mem >>VCPUs State Time(s) >>Domain-0 0 941 2 r----- >>74.4 >>vm1 256 1 >> 0.0 >> >> >>I think that xm new command should cause a command error if without >>uuid parameter. What do you think? > > >Either that, or check that the name isn't a duplicate - I added such >a check for "xm create" and "xm restore" about two months ago, >because it would allow multiple instances of the same domain (with >the same UUID - something I never got to the bottom of). Thanks for your opinion. Your patch is changeset 15168, isn't it? Best regards, Kan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |