[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] consider vcpu-pin weight on CreditScheduler TAKE2


  • To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Emmanuel Ackaouy <ackaouy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:52:32 +0200
  • Cc: Atsushi SAKAI <sakaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:50:29 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=lJ7HFkIm0WoOsNWD32WyGsma+yN9S7pzs657+XCJFDDiRDy9JoAcUzM1qyiTo7R6YyjujEaQ3nFKt7xzopeJXlAE/8/v/2UYpwyVSIB1Ej2ZKqUdq1YrtvF35euYaqItiZQMWqTBzXnsS9GdY8KExmh+2XW3pWGMd46eMEnlacs=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Jun 27, 2007, at 14:31, Keir Fraser wrote:
Partitioning is a very sensible simplification in many (most?) cases, but would need plumbing all the way up through xen-api, which is a pain. I still suspect that the patch could be simplified even without interface changes. I
don't understand the need to add extra complexity on every accounting
period.

If you don't want to change the API, the partitioning could just
automagically happen when all distinct cpu affinity masks set
using the existing interface are non-overlapping.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.