[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: special video mode numbers


  • To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:34:14 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:32:17 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AceydobAxWOupB5pEdy5vQAX8io7RQ==
  • Thread-topic: special video mode numbers

On 19/6/07 13:03, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> is there a particular reason you chose to use slightly different special mode
> numbers than Linux, ignoring VIDEO_CURRENT_MODE altogether? I think
> it wouldn't be bad to be in sync with Linux here, and I independently think
> that having a way to avoid mode switching altogether is good to have in
> case of possible problems on exotic hardware.

You mean specifically put back usual meanings of 0xffff,0xfffe, and also
include 'current' back into the special list at the correct place in the
range starting from 0x0f00? Sounds reasonable, I just doubted anyone really
uses those numbers. Getting back the 'use current' capability certainly
seems reasonable.

There's a slight question of what to do if 'no-real-mode' is specified.
Currently I assume 80x25 and hope that noone will really need to use that
boot option in anger! Another would be to assume nothing and not allow any
usage of vga at all.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.